Home

Upward Spiral Instead of a Downward One

Stan Sorscher

When I was young, the purpose of public policy was to raise our standard of living. Not so much, anymore. Now, public policy is designed to make business succeed, or be "competitive."

Our current policies are particularly well-crafted to the goal of making large multinational businesses succeed. Our policies benefit those businesses directly, while workers and small businesses make a leap of faith that boon will trickle our way. Corporate profits are at historic levels.

This has not raised our standard of living. Wages, adjusted for inflation, are stuck at 1975 levels, even though productivity has doubled in that time.

Read more...

 

High Tech Workers Could Lose TAA Benefits in January

Unemployment insurance isn't the only thing that laid-off high tech workers could loose at the end of this year. High tech workers could also lose TAA (Trade Adjustment Assistance) benefits. The TAA Act provides benefits, including retraining, to workers who have lost their job due to trade agreements with other countries that facilitate the offshoring of American jobs.

Read more...

 

A GROSS INSULT TO UNEMPLOYED AMERICANS

by Jim Hightower

At last, Obama is getting serious about America's jobs crisis, proposing a $50-billion effort to put Americans to work repairing our national infrastructure. Of course, congressional Republicans have responded as they always do: petulantly shouting "no" and plopping their fat butts down in the middle of the legislative path to block progress.

But Obama could take one symbolic step on his own that would create jobs for about a dozen American workers. It involves the construction of a memorial and statue of Martin Luther King, Jr. on our National Mall. After all, King's historic 1963 march on Washington was about jobs and poverty – so why not have some of our highly-skilled bricklayers and stone masons who're now unemployed build this monument in honor of King's legacy?

Read More

Read more...

 

100 Years Ago, Teddy Roosevelt made a speech for us

New Nationalism was Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive political philosophy during the 1912 election. He made the case for what he called the New Nationalism in a speech in Osawatomie, Kansas, in August 1910. The central issue he argued was human welfare versus property rights. He insisted that only a powerful federal government could regulate the economy and guarantee social justice. Roosevelt believed that the concentration in industry was not necessarily bad, if the industry behaved responsibly. He wanted executive agencies (not the courts) to regulate business. The federal government should be used to protect the laboring men, women and children from what he believed to be exploitation. In terms of policy, the New Nationalism supported child labor laws and minimum wage laws for women. Roosevelt supported graduated income and inheritance taxes, workers' compensation for industrial accidents, regulation of the labor of women and children, tariff revision, and firmer regulation of corporations.

Read Teddy Roosevelt's profound speech.

 

The Election Needs You, Broken Heart and All

by Paul Loeb

"OK, so your heart's broken," as the old song goes. So's mine. But we have to get over it--now--and start taking action for the November election.

Granted, we're far from where we thought we'd be when Barack Obama was elected and people danced in the streets. Change was on its way, spearheaded by Obama's soaring words and by the millions of ordinary Americans who got involved as never before to help carry him to victory. We thought we'd finally created the opening for a historic transformation.

Follow this link to read the story.

 

Chamber, ACIP Say Foreign Workers Needed, Slam AFL-CIO Immigration Commission Plan

 by Stan Sorscher

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Council on International Personnel issued a report Aug. 11 highlighting the importance of highly skilled foreign workers and blasting arguments made by the AFL-CIO in favor of a commission to determine the future flow of guestworkers.

According to the report, titled Regaining America's Competitive Advantage: Making Our Immigration System Work, the “admission of high skilled foreign nationals provides significant benefits to the U.S. economy and much of the criticism levied at such foreign nationals and their employers is misplaced.”

Part of the chamber's report focuses on rebutting a study  released in Dec. 2009 by AFL-CIO's Department for Professional Employees that found that employers who use the H-1B program often abuse the system, by claiming false labor shortages to justify importing workers who then are intimidated and forced to work for low pay.

“Closing the door to highly educated individuals who allow U.S. companies to remain successful and competitive will weaken, not strengthen, our country's economy,” said Randel K. Johnson, senior vice president of labor, immigration, and employee benefits for the chamber. “The best policy for the United States is one that sides with freedom and innovation, not restriction,” he added.

Read More

Read more...

 

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 8 of 10

Resources
Headlines are updated daily, visit laborradio.org for more information.
Find Federal Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

Find State Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

Contact The Media
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State